The Admissibility of Expert Witnesses Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 5000 words

The Admissibility of Expert Witnesses - Essay ExampleThe battle of dueling dependables has become fairly counterproductive, with the reputations and persuasiveness of the experts involved becoming more important than the objective evidence they can provide.It is now thinkable to join The Society of Expert Witnesses in the UK. The motto of the organization, quisque ad praestantiam nitens is, ironically, translated with a lack of expertise to for each one towards excellence striving - when each striving towards excellence is surely the correct wording in current English. The Society was only founded in 1995, but the Latin motto shows that it is attempting to suggest that it is somehow an established start up of the legal system rather than a relative newcomer. Of course brevity of existence is no appreciation of quality, but the attempt to create the sense of history that does not exist perhaps is.The definition of an expert witness has gone through a long development. Formal ed ucation in a fount is not necessarily needed, as was established as earliest as R. v. Silverlock (1894), in which a solicitor who had studied handwriting for more than ten years was accepted as an expert even though he had no formal training in the subject. R. V. Robb (1991) established a similar principle and answer it through saying that the lookout of fact (Judge or Jury) should be the one that decides how much weight to slacken off to it. Thus the degree of expertise (or otherwise) shown by the expert witness should be decided by the finder of fact. The Society gives a succinct description of both expert and expert witness on its take page on the Internet. While these are not formal definitions found within the law, they are at least a starting point for the consideration of contributors to the trial whose role is somewhat uncertain. There is no comprehensive definition of expert witness, so the Society may well be a help in studying suchAn expert is anyone with cognition or experience of a exceptionalfield of discipline beyond what is expected of a layman.An expert witness is an expert who makes his or her knowledgeavailable to a court (or other judicial or quasi-judicial body) tohelp it understand the issues of a parapraxis and reach a sound and justdecision. 1The definition of expert would seem to be extraordinarily broad, and would include large segments of the population within an increasingly specialized society. No mention is made of educational qualifications, let alone the graduate degrees that might be expected for one who calls herself an expert. The Society seems to be attempting to gain as broad a definition as possible for expert, which is logical as its eldest listed aim is to assist members in running their expert witness business by any competent means.2The fact that being an expert witness can now become a estimable time source of self-employment may be starkly contrasted to the early days of expert witnesses in the early to mid Twentieth Century, when they were experts within their fields (often scientific or forensic in